Diddy’s Legal Team Fights Back Against Sexual Assault Allegations: Laws Didn’t Exist at Time of Incident

The legal battle between Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs and Joi Dickerson-Neal has taken a new turn as Diddy’s legal team fights back against the accusations of sexual assault. The crux of the argument lies in the timing of the laws under which Diddy is being sued, with his lawyers contending that the statutes invoked by Dickerson-Neal did not exist at the time of the alleged incidents.

Diddy’s attorneys are pushing for the dismissal of these specific claims, emphasizing that their client cannot be held accountable under laws that were not in effect when the alleged assault took place. They maintain Diddy’s innocence and are adamant that the accusations of sexual assault should be invalidated due to the timing of the laws in question.

While Diddy’s legal team is contesting the claims under specific statutes, they are not challenging the common law claims of assault and battery, as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress. These claims do not rely on the timing of specific laws and are therefore being approached differently in the legal battle.

In addition to disputing the applicability of certain laws, Diddy’s lawyers are also contesting Dickerson-Neal’s attempt to sue Bad Boy Records and Bad Boy Entertainment, arguing that these entities did not exist at the time of the alleged incidents and should not be held liable.

As the legal battle continues to unfold, the outcome remains uncertain. The case highlights the complexities of legal proceedings and the importance of timing and specificity in legal claims.