Opinion: Kamala Harris’ Debate Performance Was Not “Amazing” or “Awesome”

Kamala Harris’ Debate Performance: Just Holding It in the Road

In a recent op-ed, Michael Harriot delves into the nuances of Black culture and how it relates to the recent vice-presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. He highlights the unique way in which Black elders in the South often downplay their achievements, using colorful expressions to describe their state of being.

Harriot goes on to analyze Harris’ debate performance, noting that while she was composed, articulate, and presidential, she did not necessarily deliver an “amazing” or “awesome” performance. Instead, she performed in a manner consistent with her background as a prosecutor and senator.

Despite Harris’ strong showing, Harriot acknowledges that her opponent, Trump, displayed his usual erratic behavior. He points out that Harris strategically focused on maintaining her composure and sticking to her talking points, knowing that she did not need to engage with Trump’s nonsensical arguments.

Ultimately, Harriot emphasizes the importance of Harris’ performance in the context of the upcoming election. He notes that as a Black woman running for president, Harris must navigate a different set of expectations and challenges compared to her opponent. Despite her excellence, success is not guaranteed, and she must continue to present herself as reasonable, rational, and presidential at all times.

In conclusion, Harriot reflects on the reality of being Black in America, where excellence does not always lead to success. He acknowledges the resilience and perseverance of Black individuals who continue to navigate a society that often fails to recognize their achievements. Harris’ debate performance, while commendable, is just another example of Black excellence in a world where success is not always guaranteed.